Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04413 ADDENDUM
ADDENDUM TO 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04413 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Vietnam Service 
Medal (VSM). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

RESUME OF CASE: 

 

On 10 Jan 12, the Board considered and denied applicant’s 
original request for award of the VSM and RVCM. In the initial 
case, the applicant provided copies of paid travel vouchers and 
correspondence related to his receipt of combat zone tax 
exclusion in support of his contention he had served in the 
Republic of Vietnam and was therefore eligible for the requested 
awards. While the Air Force OPR found these documents 
sufficient to conclude he served in the Republic of Vietnam and 
issued him a “boots on the ground” letter, the Board was not 
convinced that he served in the Republic of Vietnam for the 
requisite 30 consecutive or 60 non-consecutive days to be 
eligible for the VSM and, by extension, the RVCM and denied his 
request. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances 
surrounding the applicant’s original request and the rationale 
of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of 
Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit F. 

 

By virtue of an undated letter with attachments, the applicant 
requests reconsideration of his request based on new evidence. 
In support of his request, the applicant provides a notarized 
statement from a person he worked with during his stay in the 
Republic of Vietnam as a crew chief on aircraft #58-744. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit G. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided 
in support of his appeal, we remain unconvinced the applicant 
has been a victim of an error or injustice. We have previously 
determined that the applicant was not the victim of an error or 
injustice with respect to his request for the Vietnam Service 
Medal (VSM) or Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). While 
the applicant has provided a supporting statement from a former 
comrade attesting to the fact the applicant served with him in 
the Republic of Vietnam, we do not find the supporting statement 
sufficient to override the rationale expressed in our previous 
decision. While the applicant has established that he had boots 
on the ground in the Republic of Vietnam, the totality of 
evidence presented in this case is insufficient to convince us 
that he met the requisite service requirements for award of the 
VSM or RVCM. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. Therefore, in view of the above and 
in the absence evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or 
injustice; and the application will only be reconsidered upon 
the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not 
considered with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered the applicant’s 
request for reconsideration of AFBCMR Docket Number 
BC-2010-04413 in Executive Session on 19 Sep 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following additional documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit F. Addendum to ROP, dated 15 Feb 12, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atchs. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Acting Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 02467 2

    Original file (BC 2012 02467 2.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By virtue of a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, dated 9 Jul 14, the applicant is requesting award of the VSM. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: After reviewing the evidence of record, the applicant’s prior submission, and the additional evidence provided in support of his appeal, we are not convinced the requested relief is warranted. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02467 was considered: Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01922

    Original file (BC-2011-01922.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01922 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Air Medal (AM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). Neither the applicant’s submission or his military personnel records contain enough official documentation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03747

    Original file (BC-2011-03747.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03747 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect: a. Award of the Bronze Star Medal with Valor (BSM w/V), the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM), Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM), and the Philippine Defense Medal...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-05113

    Original file (BC-2011-05113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Only members who meet the criteria for the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (Vietnam) or VSM during the period of service are considered to have contributed direct combat support to the RVN armed forces. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-05372

    Original file (BC-2012-05372.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05372 COUNSEL: NONE ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the following awards: 1. After a thorough review of the applicant’s official military personnel record they were unable to verify award of the RVCM and the VSM. The applicant’s claimed dates of service in Thailand are after the award inclusive period for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04798

    Original file (BC-2011-04798.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04798 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect his award of the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). DPSIDR indicates that the Directorate of Personnel Assignments (DPA)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05257

    Original file (BC 2013 05257.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05257 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). There is no official documentation in the applicant’s official military record verifying he was in the area of eligibility for an aggregate of six months in support of the Vietnam Armed Forces. While the applicant contends that the fact that he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00589

    Original file (BC-2012-00589.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00589 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. f. Any unit awards for time served in Vietnam. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03568

    Original file (BC-2010-03568.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03568 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded: 1. The RVCM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who: 1) served for six months in South Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 and 28 March 1973; or, served outside the geographical limits of South Vietnam and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03452

    Original file (BC-2012-03452.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03452 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded and Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVCM). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we do not find the evidence presented by the applicant is...